TPA Article (October 2006)
School
Forests: Part of a Larger Solution to
Public School Funding?
PART TWO-
Nick Hylla
In a previous writing, I briefly outlined how school
forests fit into a broader solution to public school funding. The article
described a vision for public school classrooms that has the potential to
improve student performance, reduce the cost of public education, and produce
citizens that understand the issues that face our communities and landscapes.
My proposal is that by collaborating with other education
movements and working with
Why is public education important to forest stakeholders?
The future of forestry in
The vision I offered for public school classrooms is as
follows:
Wisconsin public schools continue their
outstanding record of achievement in reading, math, and science.
Districts continue to place priority on teaching and testing these important
subjects. Districts improve retention and provide students with comprehensive,
real-life learning experiences by creating and sustaining interdisciplinary
learning environments focused on locally relevant issues. Students are
involved in economics, art, literature, society, and environment through
projects and experiences connected to their school, community, and region. Districts take charge of their curriculum
through teacher training and collaboration and by developing partnerships
with regionally active agencies and industries.
The two underlined sentences in the vision represent
aspects of public school education that we have the ability to influence.
Let’s begin by recognizing that public education is a
complex bureaucracy with multiple centers of control. It is necessary that we
focus our energies in areas that are both prepared for change and are in need
of expertise. Momentum for change and evidence of need currently exist in the
following areas: 1) the development/adoption of curriculum, 2) student
assessment, and 3) teacher in-service training.
The above trends provide opportunity for alternative
education strategies. One education strategy that can fill this need is found
in many education movements: environmental education, experiential education,
sustainability education, project-based education, place-based education,
integrated science education, etc. Each of these movements embraces the idea
that students benefit from an interdisciplinary learning environment (think
school forests) where they can inquire, apply, theorize, test, collaborate, discuss,
and debate.
Forestry education, as part of a comprehensive,
multi-institutional strategy, is well-placed to fill current needs. Forestry
education has effective lesson guides that are aligned to Wisconsin Model
Academic Standards. We have an effective teacher training program that offers
university credit and advancement opportunities to teachers. We have committed
funding sources from the state and the forest industry. We have a school forest
program with 346 registered school forests. We have agency and industry
expertise across the state. And most importantly, forests and forestry are
central to the health of
By joining forces with other education movements, we have
the potential to strengthen our public schools and prepare the next generation
to meet the challenges on the horizon.